Miranda also stated that in 1992, Valdez was in charge of cocaine trafficking, and that later, Valdez trafficked in 200 to 400 kilogram shipments of marijuana for the AFO. 23. No charges have been filed against Anaya, and he denies the allegations. Fausto Soto Miller presented But the deal fell apart when the other inmate couldn't pay the promised . Collins v. Loisel,259 U.S. 309, 316, 42 S. Ct. 469, 66 L. Ed. There is no authority that exists that requires a magistrate judge to authorize compelled disclosures of explanatory information. EMILIO VALDEZ MAINERO (hereinafter "Valdez" or "Respondent")[1] is accused by Mexico of having been involved with or committing various crimes in violation of Mexican laws. 371. Matter of Extradition of Mainero, 990 F. Supp. 1208 - CourtListener This is in contrast to the September 27, 1996 arrest date noted in the statement to the federal prosecutor. While the Court has wide latitude in admitting evidence, and hearsay evidence is admissible, the Ruiz statement is without any legally reliable corroborating or authenticating evidence in this case. Seduction of a Generation - Los Angeles Times Mexican prosecutors persuade California courts to send Alfredo Hodoyan Palacios and Emilio Valdez Mainero, alleged paid killers for a vicious drug ring based in Tijuana, back to Mexico to face . 'Narcos: Mxico 3' reparto: Quin es 'Kitty' Pez? Historia - RPP [8] See RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF EXTRADITION filed September 29, 1997 (Docket No. In the Matter of the Extradition of Contreras,800 F. Supp. According to testimony given to Mexican authorities, the Arellanos _ led by brothers Benjamin, Ramon, Javier and Francisco _ have been able to coordinate major assassinations with the aid of the attorney general of Baja California, Jose Luis Anaya Bautista. On the other hand, the formal statements of Soto and Cruz have significant detail concerning the personal background of the witnesses and the specifics of the offenses and related matters. 18 U.S.C. In fact, they are of relatively little evidentiary value herein and as such, an extended analysis is unnecessary. Under that rule, "an extraditing court will generally not inquire into the procedures or treatment which await a surrendered fugitive in the requesting country." In the statement to the judge, with the assistance of counsel, Cruz was asked by the Court if he desired to make a statement concerning the facts that are attributed to him in the subject statement. The date of production for the photographic evidence was set for November 5, 1997[9] and later extended with properly authenticated and certified originals being filed on December 1, 1997. As noted previously, Respondent also offers the expert opinion of Rodolfo Gastelum Perez which has been excluded under the analysis previously set forth.[31].
How To Change Default Bullet In Google Docs,
Military Toast To The Fallen,
Articles E
